Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

That the return of notices issued under Section 133(6) unserved by the postal authorities is not sufficient to reach to the conclusion that sales to those parties are not genuine where the assesse has provided all the documentary evidence to prove genuineness of the sales. Further, disallowance on the ground of non-genuine sales cannot be a basis for addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha03188
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Download, M/s Singhal Exim Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer, ITA No.6520/Del/2018

Related posts

The Long duration post graduate programs offered by Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore will be exempt from GST under Si. no. 66 of the Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) – AAR Karnataka

Team Taxcharcha

The exemption of Rs. 50 lakh in s. 194-IA(2) is applicable w.r.t. the amount related to each transferee and not with reference to the amount as per sale deed. Each transferee is a separate income tax entity and the law has to be applied with reference to each transferee as an individual transferee / person – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Merely because assessee company had filed all primary evidence, it could not be said that onus on assessee company to establish the credit worthiness of investor companies stood discharge. Assessing Officer was justified in passing assessment order making additions under section 68 for share capital/share premium received by assessee company – SC

Team Taxcharcha