Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

That the return of notices issued under Section 133(6) unserved by the postal authorities is not sufficient to reach to the conclusion that sales to those parties are not genuine where the assesse has provided all the documentary evidence to prove genuineness of the sales. Further, disallowance on the ground of non-genuine sales cannot be a basis for addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Download, M/s Singhal Exim Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer, ITA No.6520/Del/2018

Related posts

Rectification of GSTR- 3B stayed by the Supreme court of India in case of Bharti Airtel Limited

Team Taxcharcha

Merely recording of the conclusion and not the reasoning makes the order of the CIT(A) invalid and the same transfered back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

HC wrong in taking the technical view of dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay when it has to decide the question of law between the parties in any case in respect of earlier assessment year – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha