Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

That the return of notices issued under Section 133(6) unserved by the postal authorities is not sufficient to reach to the conclusion that sales to those parties are not genuine where the assesse has provided all the documentary evidence to prove genuineness of the sales. Further, disallowance on the ground of non-genuine sales cannot be a basis for addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha03108
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Download, M/s Singhal Exim Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer, ITA No.6520/Del/2018

Related posts

Union of India vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – No GST under RCM on Ocean Freight on CIF basis

Team Taxcharcha

In terms of section 194A(1), The time of deduction of tax u/s 194A(1) is undisputedly time at which interest is to be credited to account of payee or when it is paid in cash/cheque or draft therefore, deduction of tax at source on interest income before close of financial year concerned as provided under section 194A(4) would not obligate assessee bank from penalty for not deducting tax at source at time of credit of said income in payee’s account – HC Allahabad

Team Taxcharcha

When the assessee company stands dissolved as defunct company u/s 560(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 (section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013) that doesn’t mean that income tax proceedings and appeals become infructuous. – Supreme Court of India

Team Taxcharcha