Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

That the return of notices issued under Section 133(6) unserved by the postal authorities is not sufficient to reach to the conclusion that sales to those parties are not genuine where the assesse has provided all the documentary evidence to prove genuineness of the sales. Further, disallowance on the ground of non-genuine sales cannot be a basis for addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Download, M/s Singhal Exim Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer, ITA No.6520/Del/2018

Related posts

Union of India vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – No GST under RCM on Ocean Freight on CIF basis

Team Taxcharcha

Even if no activity has been carried out by the assessee-society towards its objects, it would not make the assessee-society disentitle for approval under section 80G of the I.T. Act. – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Where the additions and disallowances are deleted by the higher authorities, there is no basis for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha