Taxcharcha
Income TaxIncome TaxLawRecent Case LawsTax

In terms of section 194A(1), The time of deduction of tax u/s 194A(1) is undisputedly time at which interest is to be credited to account of payee or when it is paid in cash/cheque or draft therefore, deduction of tax at source on interest income before close of financial year concerned as provided under section 194A(4) would not obligate assessee bank from penalty for not deducting tax at source at time of credit of said income in payee’s account – HC Allahabad

Held : 

Deduction of tax at source on interest income before close of the financial year concerned as provided under Section 194 A (4) of the Act would not absolve the assessee Bank from penalty for not deducting the tax at source from the interest income of the Agra Development Authority at the time of credit of the said income in its account and that there was no reasonable cause on part of the assesee Bank for not deducting tax at source on the interest income of the Agra Development Authority so as to permit any benefit of exemption from penalty as envisaged under Section 273 B of the Act.

Facts of the Case : 

  1. The assessee Bank had various fixed deposits of the Agra Development Authority under different IDs for many years.
  2. It failed to deduct tax at source (TDS) and deposit the same with the Central Government for the financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14.
  3. Accordingly, penalty under Section 271 C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short of the Act) amounting to Rs. 6,84,167/- and Rs. 13,23,794/-was imposed for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively.

To download complete order, Union Bank Of India Ada Branch Jaipur House Agra ITA No. 225 & 230 of 2017

Related posts

When the assessee company stands dissolved as defunct company u/s 560(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 (section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013) that doesn’t mean that income tax proceedings and appeals become infructuous. – Supreme Court of India

Team Taxcharcha

The Long duration post graduate programs offered by Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore will be exempt from GST under Si. no. 66 of the Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) – AAR Karnataka

Team Taxcharcha

Merely because assessee company had filed all primary evidence, it could not be said that onus on assessee company to establish the credit worthiness of investor companies stood discharge. Assessing Officer was justified in passing assessment order making additions under section 68 for share capital/share premium received by assessee company – SC

Team Taxcharcha