Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

It is irrelevant whether the assessee is a public sector undertaking. Unless specifically provided under law or intended by necessary implication under specific provisions of law, or held in binding judicial precedents; a public sector undertaking cannot legitimately claim a preferential treatment in determination of its tax liabilities.- ITAT Delhi

M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ITAT-Delhi-23.03_03.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

Related posts

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha

Where no satisfaction note in the searched persons proceeding recorded separately, the jurisdiction assumed u/s 153C in the case of the assessee is not in accordance with provisions of section 153C – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

The exemption of Rs. 50 lakh in s. 194-IA(2) is applicable w.r.t. the amount related to each transferee and not with reference to the amount as per sale deed. Each transferee is a separate income tax entity and the law has to be applied with reference to each transferee as an individual transferee / person – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha