Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

That the return of notices issued under Section 133(6) unserved by the postal authorities is not sufficient to reach to the conclusion that sales to those parties are not genuine where the assesse has provided all the documentary evidence to prove genuineness of the sales. Further, disallowance on the ground of non-genuine sales cannot be a basis for addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha02815
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Download, M/s Singhal Exim Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer, ITA No.6520/Del/2018

Related posts

Deduction u/s 54 is allowed even if the assessee purchased new residential house before the sale of another residential house owned by him – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha

Merely recording of the conclusion and not the reasoning makes the order of the CIT(A) invalid and the same transfered back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Where the assesse has made the FDR out of borrowed funds, the interest on such FDRs cannot be added back by invoking the provisions of section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha