Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

Having regard to the manner in which the Assessing Officer has issued notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act without striking off the irrelevant words, the penalty proceedings show a non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer and is, thus, unsustainable.- ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha01018
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi-05.04.2019_2019-1.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Dowload , Shree Mahadev Cotex Vs ITO. ITA No. 6447/Del/2018

Related posts

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha

Where the Ld. CIT(A) passed the order exparte due to non appearance by the assessee, the assessee is given one final opportunity of being heard and in case of adjournment, the CIT(A) can pass any order which e may deem fit under law. – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

An order passed by the Tribunal even one day after the prescribed period of 90 days from the date of hearing causes prejudice to the assessee and is liable to be recalled – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha