Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

Having regard to the manner in which the Assessing Officer has issued notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act without striking off the irrelevant words, the penalty proceedings show a non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer and is, thus, unsustainable.- ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha0938
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi-05.04.2019_2019-1.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Dowload , Shree Mahadev Cotex Vs ITO. ITA No. 6447/Del/2018

Related posts

Union of India vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – No GST under RCM on Ocean Freight on CIF basis

Team Taxcharcha

Where the notice issued by the CIT(A) was not served on the assessee and the CIT(A) passed the order ex-parte on the non appearance of the assessee. The same remanded back to the CIT(A) – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Where the notice issued u/s 271(1)(c) read with section 274 of the act does not specify whether the penalty is for concealment of income or for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, the same is bad in law and no penalty can be levied.

Team Taxcharcha