Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

Where the notice issued by the CIT(A) was not served on the assessee and the CIT(A) passed the order ex-parte on the non appearance of the assessee. The same remanded back to the CIT(A) – ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha0748
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

Facts of the case :

  1. Notice of hearing was sent to the assessee on 02.08.2018 by Speed Post.
  2. However, the same was returned back with the postal remarks “No such person”.
  3. The Bench was of the view that the appeal can be disposed off in the absence of the AR of the assessee considering the arguments of the Department Representative and the materials available on record.
  4. Therefore, the appeal was heard ex parte qua the assessee and disposed of considering the submission of the Departmental Representative

Discussions: 

  1. It is observed that in the appellate order passed by the CIT(A), the CIT(A) has stated about the issuance of notice of hearing to the assessee.
  2. The CIT(A) nowhere states in the order, whether, the notice issued to the assessee for hearing was served upon the assessee.

Held:

In the above background of the case, I set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restore the matter back to his file to adjudicate the appeal of the assessee afresh after allowing reasonable and proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

To Download, Vayuputra Steel P. Ltd ITA no. 6769/Del/2018

Related posts

In terms of section 194A(1), The time of deduction of tax u/s 194A(1) is undisputedly time at which interest is to be credited to account of payee or when it is paid in cash/cheque or draft therefore, deduction of tax at source on interest income before close of financial year concerned as provided under section 194A(4) would not obligate assessee bank from penalty for not deducting tax at source at time of credit of said income in payee’s account – HC Allahabad

Team Taxcharcha

CIT(A) cannot enhance the assessment on the matter which is not arising out of the assessment proceedings – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

The Supreme Court affirms the decision of Madras High Court wherein it was held that Rule 89(5) does not restrict itself to ITC on goods but it also includes ITC on services while claiming refund under Inverted Duty Structure. (13-09-2021)

Team Taxcharcha