Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

That the disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the actual exempt income received by the assessee during the year. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer – ITAT Delhi

M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ITAT-Delhi-28.03_03-1.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Download, Mahagun India pvt. Ltd

Related posts

the provisions of Sec.2(22)(e) were not applicable since the payment was mere reimbursement of expenditure by M/s PHL – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha

When the assessee company stands dissolved as defunct company u/s 560(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 (section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013) that doesn’t mean that income tax proceedings and appeals become infructuous. – Supreme Court of India

Team Taxcharcha

Union of India vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – No GST under RCM on Ocean Freight on CIF basis

Team Taxcharcha