Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

by Team Taxcharcha0773
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha

Registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Team Taxcharcha

Where the order is passed ex parte making an addition of Rs. 6 Lacs, the case is remanded back to CIT(A) directing it to provide final opportunity of being heard to the assessee

Team Taxcharcha