Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

Where no satisfaction note in the searched persons proceeding recorded separately, the jurisdiction assumed u/s 153C in the case of the assessee is not in accordance with provisions of section 153C – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

The Supreme Court affirms the decision of Madras High Court wherein it was held that Rule 89(5) does not restrict itself to ITC on goods but it also includes ITC on services while claiming refund under Inverted Duty Structure. (13-09-2021)

Team Taxcharcha

GST is attracted on the services of employees of Corporate Office to Branch Office : AAR Karnataka

Team Taxcharcha