Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

by Team Taxcharcha0949
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

For the imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act either concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income are since qua non – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

It is irrelevant whether the assessee is a public sector undertaking. Unless specifically provided under law or intended by necessary implication under specific provisions of law, or held in binding judicial precedents; a public sector undertaking cannot legitimately claim a preferential treatment in determination of its tax liabilities.- ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

That the disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the actual exempt income received by the assessee during the year. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha