Taxcharcha
Income TaxIncome TaxLatestRecent Case Laws

Where no satisfaction note in the searched persons proceeding recorded separately, the jurisdiction assumed u/s 153C in the case of the assessee is not in accordance with provisions of section 153C – ITAT Delhi

M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ITAT-Delhi-1-2.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

To download the complete order, click here  ITA No.1720-Del-2015-ACIT vs. Gracious Project Pvt. ltd.

Related posts

The period of holding of ESOP options clarified and to be considered as Long term irrespective of the date of vesting of the same – ITAT Bangalore

Team Taxcharcha

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha

Extension of due date for filing Income tax return for AY 2019-20

Team Taxcharcha