Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

by Team Taxcharcha0719
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

An order passed by the Tribunal even one day after the prescribed period of 90 days from the date of hearing causes prejudice to the assessee and is liable to be recalled – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha

As the assessee is regularly following the accounting practice of making provision on year to year basis on the basis of the performance of the employees and the same is definite and accured liability of the assessee for the year for which the services have been rendered by the employees and the same partakes the character of the salary and hence cannot be disallowed. – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha