Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

by Team Taxcharcha01014
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

Merely because assessee company had filed all primary evidence, it could not be said that onus on assessee company to establish the credit worthiness of investor companies stood discharge. Assessing Officer was justified in passing assessment order making additions under section 68 for share capital/share premium received by assessee company – SC

Team Taxcharcha

The Supreme Court affirms the decision of Madras High Court wherein it was held that Rule 89(5) does not restrict itself to ITC on goods but it also includes ITC on services while claiming refund under Inverted Duty Structure. (13-09-2021)

Team Taxcharcha

That the disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the actual exempt income received by the assessee during the year. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha