Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

Where a company has been dissolved, such dissolution may be set aside within a period of two years from the date of such dissolution under section 356 of the Companies Act, 2013 – Supreme Court of India

Team Taxcharcha

Deduction u/s 54 is allowed even if the assessee purchased new residential house before the sale of another residential house owned by him – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha

Mentioning of wrong section and wrong facts in the reasons recorded for reopening of the assessment u/s 148 made the reassessment liable to be quashed – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha