Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The Counsel being out of town cannot be a valid ground for the purpose of adjournment in any case – Supreme Court

by Team Taxcharcha0981
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

In the judgement by the Supreme Court, it was strictly held that the counsel being out of town is no valid ground for the purpose of adjournment. it was also held that as there is no valid ground for adjournment, under no circumstances, application for restoration shall be entertained.

To download, Ram-Tripathi Supreme Court Judgement

 

Related posts

That the return of notices issued under Section 133(6) unserved by the postal authorities is not sufficient to reach to the conclusion that sales to those parties are not genuine where the assesse has provided all the documentary evidence to prove genuineness of the sales. Further, disallowance on the ground of non-genuine sales cannot be a basis for addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Where the assesse has made the FDR out of borrowed funds, the interest on such FDRs cannot be added back by invoking the provisions of section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Where no satisfaction note in the searched persons proceeding recorded separately, the jurisdiction assumed u/s 153C in the case of the assessee is not in accordance with provisions of section 153C – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha