Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

by Team Taxcharcha0999
Refund under Inverted duty structure

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Supreme-Court.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

To Download, Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi) vs Ram Kishan Dass Civil Appeal Nos. 3211 to 3230 of 2019 oths.

Related posts

In terms of section 194A(1), The time of deduction of tax u/s 194A(1) is undisputedly time at which interest is to be credited to account of payee or when it is paid in cash/cheque or draft therefore, deduction of tax at source on interest income before close of financial year concerned as provided under section 194A(4) would not obligate assessee bank from penalty for not deducting tax at source at time of credit of said income in payee’s account – HC Allahabad

Team Taxcharcha

Merely because assessee company had filed all primary evidence, it could not be said that onus on assessee company to establish the credit worthiness of investor companies stood discharge. Assessing Officer was justified in passing assessment order making additions under section 68 for share capital/share premium received by assessee company – SC

Team Taxcharcha

Excise & Customs : Exemption notifications should be interpreted strictly, assessee cannot take benefit of ambiguity in exemption notification – SC

Team Taxcharcha