Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

The provisions of Section 142(2C) did not preclude the exercise of jurisdiction and authority by the assessing officer to extend time for the submission of the audit report directed under sub-section (2A), without an application by the assessee. We hold and declare that the amendment was intended to remove an ambiguity and is clarificatory in nature – Supreme Court

Refund under Inverted duty structure

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Supreme-Court.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

To Download, Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi) vs Ram Kishan Dass Civil Appeal Nos. 3211 to 3230 of 2019 oths.

Related posts

Rectification of GSTR- 3B stayed by the Supreme court of India in case of Bharti Airtel Limited

Team Taxcharcha

An order passed by the Tribunal even one day after the prescribed period of 90 days from the date of hearing causes prejudice to the assessee and is liable to be recalled – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha

Analysis of the definition of “Basic Wage” and its exclusions and inclusions by the Supreme Court in its latest judgement – SC

Team Taxcharcha