Taxcharcha
Income TaxRecent Case Laws

Having regard to the manner in which the Assessing Officer has issued notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act without striking off the irrelevant words, the penalty proceedings show a non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer and is, thus, unsustainable.- ITAT Delhi

by Team Taxcharcha0997
M/S ADMACH AUTO LIMITED, ITA NO. 9543/DEL/2019

 

 

[docxpresso file=”https://taxcharcha.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ITAT-Delhi-05.04.2019_2019-1.odt” comments=”true” SVG=”true”]

 

To Dowload , Shree Mahadev Cotex Vs ITO. ITA No. 6447/Del/2018

Related posts

For the imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act either concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income are since qua non – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Where the assesse has made the FDR out of borrowed funds, the interest on such FDRs cannot be added back by invoking the provisions of section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

Deduction u/s 54 is allowed even if the assessee purchased new residential house before the sale of another residential house owned by him – ITAT Mumbai

Team Taxcharcha