Taxcharcha
G.S.TRecent Case Laws

GST entry error in GST TRAN -1 deprieved company from claiming credit of approx Rs. 9.75 crs, the petitioner seeks direction to correct the bonafide error – HC Karnataka

The petitoner company, Pragati Automation Pvt Ltd., appears before the Karnataka High Court seeking direction to permit them to correct the errors which was crept in while filing the GST TRAN – 1 form because of which the petitioner company is deprevied of the transitional credit of an amount of Rs. 9,74,57,802/- in their electronic credit ledger.

The High Court in this regard stated that, “the Nodal Officer appointed under the CGST and the SGST  Acts is obligated to consider the compliant of the petitioner and take the decision in this matter….. However, the same has not been done, it is imperative for this Court to Direct the Nodal Officer to consider the complaint/representation made by the petitioner and take decision in accordance with law in an expedite manner”. 

To download complete order, Pragati Automation Pvt Ltd. WP3159-19 of 31-01-2019

Related posts

HC wrong in taking the technical view of dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay when it has to decide the question of law between the parties in any case in respect of earlier assessment year – Supreme Court

Team Taxcharcha

Appeal withdrawn from ITAT as the same is filed to be settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme- ITAT Delhi

Team Taxcharcha

In terms of section 194A(1), The time of deduction of tax u/s 194A(1) is undisputedly time at which interest is to be credited to account of payee or when it is paid in cash/cheque or draft therefore, deduction of tax at source on interest income before close of financial year concerned as provided under section 194A(4) would not obligate assessee bank from penalty for not deducting tax at source at time of credit of said income in payee’s account – HC Allahabad

Team Taxcharcha